From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-23 15:44:32
Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
> Hi,
>
> STLPort doesnt seem to allow const-types as parameters to std::vector.
> It chokes in the std::allocator which define const_reference as const
> reference, making the two the same type.
> This creates multiple declarations for function-members:
>
> pointer address(reference __x) const { return &__x; }
> const_pointer address(const_reference __x) const { return &__x; }
>
> Is the STLPort right in this context or should something be done?
I believe that STLPort is correct. std::allocator<int const> isn't valid,
and neither is std::vector<int const, A> because a const type is not
Assignable.