From: Zara (yozara_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-16 04:27:04
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:29:43 +0100, Zara <yozara_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:06:08 +0000 (UTC), "AlisdairM"
><alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Zara wrote:
>>
>>> This is specially evident when IteratorT is [const] char *, which is a
>>> valid random access iterator.
>>
>>Why do you think const char * is a valid random access iterator?
>
>Yes, you are right. char * is a valid random access iteartor, const
>char * is only an input iterator, I was writing too fast.
*output iterator*. I am ashamed, seems I am unable to write what I am
thinking...
Zara