Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [interprocess, aka shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-27 20:16:52

Next message: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] [date_time] i/o formatting"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [Test] minimal test facility quesiton"
In reply to: Kim Barrett: "Re: [boost] [interprocess, aka shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review"
Next in thread: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [interprocess, aka shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review"
Reply: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [interprocess, aka shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review"

> - managed_xxx, i.e. managed_shared_memory, managed_heap
>

Not "managed" please. Copyrighted by Microsoft,
suggests association with .NET.

/Pavel

Next message: Jeff Garland: "Re: [boost] [date_time] i/o formatting"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [Test] minimal test facility quesiton"
In reply to: Kim Barrett: "Re: [boost] [interprocess, aka shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review"
Next in thread: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [interprocess, aka shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review"
Reply: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [interprocess, aka shmem] Some proposals for open issues from the review"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view