From: Ronald Garcia (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-21 12:22:06
Hi Andy,
I have received your request for review and will add you to the
review queue.
ron
On Feb 20, 2006, at 11:16 PM, Andy Little wrote:
> PQS Physical Quantities System, is now in a reasonably complete
> state, so I
> hereby request a Formal Review.
>
> pqs is designed to simplify modelling physical-quantities in C++
> programs. The
> library will eventually include 3 related types:
>
> t1_quantity where the dimension and units are fixed.
> t2_quantity where the dimension is fixed but the units can be
> modified at
> runtime.
> t3_quantity where the dimension and units can be modified at runtime.
>
> Thie subject of the Formal Review will be the t1_quantity - the
> first to be
> implemented.
>
> *t1_quantity features*
>
> The t1_quantity is a C++ representation of a physical_quantity with
> the
> dimension and units fixed at compile-time.
>
> The t1_quantity has many similar features to an inbuilt-type...
>
> * Concrete type with simple, consistent semantics close to those of
> built-in
> types.
> * Can match speed and code size performance of built-in types,
> while being much
> more user-friendly to work with.
> * Requires no special framework to use ... but with added
> functionality:
>
> * Strong type checking enforces dimensional integrity,
> catching
> calculation errors at compile time.
> * Automated unit conversion reduces drudgery.
> * Being self documenting using pqs helps code clarity.
> * Increases programmer satisfaction and enhances productivity.
>
>
> The latest version is pqs_3_0_6, which is available as a .zip from
> the 'Physical
> Quantities Units' subdirectory in the Vault.
>
> Try this tinyurl as a shortcut to downloading pqs: http://
> tinyurl.com/7m5l8
>
> The library has been tested (successfully) on the following compilers:
>
> VC7.1, VC8.0, GCC3.2, GCC4.0.
>
> Assuming this review request is successful I am looking for a
> review manager to
> supervise the review process. Heres a quick reminder of the Noble and
> Outstanding qualities required of this fine position:
>
> http://www.boost.org/more/formal_review_process.htm#Review_Manager
>
> I have spent a fair amount of time on the documentation, with
> styling courtesy
> of the Quickbook guys and very nice it is too (the styling that
> is). I would
> appreciate feedback on the content and presentation of the
> documentation
> especially, as a part of the rationale behind pqs is to provide a
> common
> specification ,and to make code self documenting thus reducing the
> need for
> extensive in-house documentation of source code.
>
> Is the documentation easy to understand?
> Is it adequately laid out? Is the layout comprehensible?
> Can you find the information you want easily?
> Is there any information lacking?
> Are there enough examples?
> Is the technical section acceptable?
>
> I would sure appreciate any comments or guidance on improving the
> documentation,
> especially from authoritative sources.
>
> Comments on the design and use of the library will also be
> generously accepted,
> together with suggestions for improvements and enhancements.
>
> The library comes complete with a selection of useage examples in
> the usual
> <libs/pqs/examples/> directory as well as tests in <libs/pqs/tests/>
>
> regards
> Andy Little
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/
> listinfo.cgi/boost