From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-21 11:53:58
"Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote
> looking at this failure:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/m6rho
>
> I wonder if that's expected failure, or an glitch?
a glitch.
> Certainly, using BOOST_WORKAROUND before including workaround.hpp is not
good
> idea?
Definitely not.
It's already been fixed in CVS -- should be OK by the next time the
regressions run.
Regards,
Arkadiy