From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-30 06:10:06
> BTW would there be any point in an is_implicitly_convertible<A,B>
> type_trait?
That's what is_convertible does now: tests for implicit convertibility.
There's no way you can test for other kinds of valid (but explicit)
conversions I believe.
John.