From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-26 15:33:50
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> "Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote
>
>
>> REGISTER_SPEC((typename T),
>> (std::set< T )( std::less<T> )( std::allocator<T> > ))
>>
>> REGISTER_SPEC((typename T)(typename Pred),
>> (std::set< T )( Pred )( std::allocator<T> > ))
>>
>> // ^^^ NOTE: not a proposal for an interface -- for illustration,
>
> only
>
> Also, please note that currently, when (class) or (typename) is passed to
> the macro, it's not just used as is. Instead, it is used to create an
> "object" that contains certain knowledge of how the type template parameter
> is different from integral template parameter and template template
> parameter. So it doesn't seem possible to just replace it with (typename
> T). We would probably have to pass them separately: (typename)(T).
>
Right - I forgot about the non-type template parameters.
((typename,T0))((typename,T1))
would be another option. Maybe there's some trick to make
(typename,T0)(typename,T1)
work (which would be the best looking notation IMO).
Regards,
Tobias