From: Sam Partington (sam.partington_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-06 09:58:38
On 1/6/06, Thorsten Ottosen <tottosen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> So you mean i->second gives back a reference?
>
> That is not a bad idea :-)
Yep, see the attached file. Just to show the outline - its missing
out most of the usual iterator stuff you need.
> Right. You asked for a more logical way to navigate. What about
> splitting the *see also* bullet into *see also* and *hierachy*
> (or something). The latter would only show links to the "virtual" base
> and derived classes, always showinf the same list, with the current page
> being a "link" you can't follow.?
That sounds perfect.
Sam :-)