From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-11 09:41:48
On Dec 11, 2005, at 2:53 AM, Daryle Walker wrote:
> I don't
> know how different it is from CWP9. Nor do I know how much of a
> difference
> is there between the free and full versions.
Fwiw, it has a full implementation of the rvalue reference.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1377.htm
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1855.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1856.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1857.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1858.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1859.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1860.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1861.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1862.html
Except that std::unique_ptr is named Metrowerks::move_ptr.
The rvalue reference functionality is off by default but you can turn
it on with:
#pragma rvalue_refs on
in your preprocessor prefix text.
> Anyway, I think Metrowerks is still providing compilers for embedded
> markets.
Yup.
-Howard