From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn-boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-21 09:11:22
Andy Little <andy <at> servocomm.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
> I would expect value_type to reflect the number of nibbles
> e.g
>
> boost::binary_int<0000,0001> // unsigned char
> boost::binary_int<0000,0000,0001> // unsigned short or unsigned int
> dependent on platform dependent type
2.13.1 Integer literals, bullet 2 states
If it is octal or hexadecimal and has no suffix, it has
the first of these types in which its value can be represented:
int, unsigned int, long int, unsigned long int.
I would expect the same for binary_literal.
-- Alexander Nasonov