From: Jim Hyslop (jhyslop_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-14 06:54:52
Russell Hind <rh_gmane <at> mac.com> writes:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > - Writing
> >
> > a.serialize(member1).serialize(member2)
> >
> > is very inconvenient.
>
> I agree. It may not be the most obvious but it allows a single
> serialize function rather than explicit save/load functions or chained
> calls as you've shown above.
So who says they have to be chained? I agree the chained calls above look rather
ugly, but what's wrong with:
a.serialize(member1);
a.serialize(member2);
Clear, concise, and consistent.
-- Jim