From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-10 14:23:54
On Oct 10, 2005, at 6:48 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> The only thing I'm missing here is why the serialization library
> itself has
> to be
> modified to support all this. It seems that all this could easily be
> encapulated in
> one (or more) separate optional headers. This would be the best of
> all
> possible
> worlds.
It seems we are very close to a consensus. I agree with you that
above would be the ideal solution. I believe that I fully understand
now where the one or two small issues are that prevent this ideal
solution, but as I said I want to explain this in detail when I'm awake.
Matthias