From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-26 05:08:52
> Sorry, I haven't been keeping up with this. Do I read it as meaning
> that [tr.num.sf] is not present in the current submission?
Correct.
The rumour I hear is that section requires about one man year of work to
implement, so it's not likely to be forthcoming from me at least any time
soon: unless someone wants to pay for it obviously!
John.