From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-26 02:56:22
Jason Hise <chaos_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Because the singleton library is now being designed to work with shared
> memory in addition to allowing multiple instances in a singleton_map
> (multiton), I have a particularly difficult situation to deal with. The
> main problem is: when a multiton exists in shared memory, who should own
> the timeout threads associated with each instance?
How about each process that accesses the singleton having a thread that checks
the timeout?
Anthony
-- Anthony Williams Software Developer Just Software Solutions Ltd http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk