From: Thore Karlsen (sid_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 11:14:05
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:23:16 +0100, "Andy Little"
<andy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> ...To be honest, I'm not convinced that
>> too much focus on comparing this concept with a real-world guard is a
>> good thing.
>hmm... if its not conceptually a guard... then why call it one?
Indeed. Maybe there's a better name for it, I don't know. I don't mind
the name, just the implications of taking the name too literally.
>How about :
>
>guard.up();
>guard.down();
I'd prefer more descriptive verbs.
-- Be seeing you.