Re: [boost] [scope_guard] New revision available + naming consideration

From: Ariel Badichi (abadichi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-21 18:41:05

David Abrahams wrote:
> 
> Another thought:
> 
>      g = 0;
> 
> it's easy to arrange that only a literal zero works there.

How?

> I don't love it, but maybe it will get your ideas flowing.
> 

Something like:

     g = guard::inactive;
     g = guard::active;

or maybe

     g = guard::dismissed;
     g = !guard::dismissed;
     (ugh)

?

Overloading operators here may be a bit counter-intuitive.