From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-21 16:45:08
Brian Ravnsgaard Riis <brian_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>
>> Brian Ravnsgaard Riis wrote:
>>
>>>Rob Stewart wrote:
>>>
>> I agree the "guard" is better. But the variable type name is scope_guard,
>> many scope guard tools are resided in boost::guard namespace, the function
>> for creating guards is make_guard. Aren't there too much guards here?
>
> Yes, probably. As I said, just a thought...
I don't care how large the population of guards is, if "guard" is the
right name.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com