From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-26 08:18:25
"Slawomir Lisznianski" <slisznianski_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:12:12 +0200, "Ariel Badichi"
>> A good solution is to provide a customization point: call a handler that
>> can be replaced by the user.
>
> The language already provides this customization through set_unexpected
> and set_terminate.
>
> Althought no standard mandates it, it is commonly expected that each
> thread can set its own terminate() or unexpected() function -- calling
> set_terminate() or set_unexpected() in one thread affects only the
> exceptions in that thread.
What's expected doesn't matter. It's what's implemented that counts.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com