From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-04 20:24:15
On Aug 3, 2005, at 6:21 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
> Is it really true that I can write
>
> bind(f, _1) > _2
>
> but can't write
>
> _1 > _2
>
> ??
>
> I can't imagine a good reason for that restriction, but I don't see
> any indication that the latter is supported in the docs.
That is a really interesting suggestion, and significantly blurs the
line between bind and lambda.
Once you have:
_1 > _2
then
_1 > literal
will pretty much come in for free (I think).
-Howard