From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-03 11:20:24
David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
[snip code]
> > [I know that this code needs improvement]
>
> If you're erasing items at the end of a list<>, that's *very*
> expensive!
Yep, I know that, that's why I wrote that the code needs improvement. Plus, as
I said, my original argument regarding this code doesn't hold water anyway...
> So, sorry to be blunt, but I maintain your arguments about
> efficiency are invalid.
I agree that mpl::list is a poor choice. BTW, I faintly remember having tried
vector right in the beginning (~2.5 years ago) but abandoned it because it
didn't work very well with MSVC7.0. So I guess I'm currently requiring
mpl::list just for historical reasons...
Regards,
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.