From: Jason Hise (chaos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-28 18:53:04
Rob Stewart wrote:
> According to the grammar, Comeau is wrong:
>
> [...]
I think comeau just complained about not having a default constructor
explicitly defined, and in order to define a constructor I had to give
the class a name. I'm not sure why it wanted the default constructor to
be explicitly defined, though.
> That may cause grief to those using the -Wshadow option of recent
> vintage GCC's.
Perhaps I can just provide the name for comeau compilations then.
-Jason