From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-28 08:06:07
On Jul 28, 2005, at 3:32 AM, Martin Wille wrote:
> Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>> Is there a reason why Intel C++ 9.0, being the latest released version
>> of that compiler, is not on the list of the required toolsets?
>
> AFAICS, Intel C++ 9 was released after the required toolsets were
> defined. There isn't a free Intel C++ 9 version for Linux, yet (it's
> scheduled for August, according to Intel).
Yep. Just like Apple's GCC 4.0 for Tiger, it came too late in the cycle
to introduce without pushing the release back.
Doug