From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-14 13:59:43
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> You could also do
>>
>> BOOST_WORKADOUND(GCC, LESS(3,2,3))
>> BOOST_WORKADOUND(GCC, LESS_EQ(3,2,3))
>> BOOST_WORKADOUND(GCC, TESTED_AT(3,2,3))
>> ...
>
> Ick; why use a name to stand in for the operator when we can use the
> operator directly?
For uniform treatment of comparisons and TESTED_AT. Maybe there's some other way
to do the same thing.
Jonathan