Re: [boost] New Library Proposal: dual_state

From: Eelis van der Weegen (gmane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-09 21:57:09

Jost, Andrew wrote:
> I am curious if there is support for what I'm calling a "dual_state"
> template class.

 From your description it sounds a lot like Boost.Optional. What are the main 
differences?

Eelis