From: Jody Hagins (jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-05 13:11:58
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:35:21 -0700
"Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Of course an alternative would be for
> <boost/serialization/shared_ptr.hpp> to include .../shared_ptr_132.hpp
> but I thought people without old archives would object to that - as I
> would personally.
Sounds like a preprocessor definition should be used instead, and then
serialization/shared_ptr.hpp can optionally include the 132 header file,
if the apprpriate definition for use-132-shared-ptr exists...
This effectively hides it from everyone, and only those who need it
would make the appropriate definition...