From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-05 09:43:24
David Abrahams wrote:
> Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>
>> The Function Type library uses tag types to represent a type's properties,
>> such as its calling convention or whether it is variadic.
>>
>>How do I make this valid English (plural tag types, singular type)?
>
>
> It's fine as is.
Great!
> I'd call this library "Function Types" (plural, like
> "Type Traits") but that that's just me.
>
Well, actually I prefer Function Types too (btw. the current draft contains a
class template with the same name as the namespace)...
So - is our rationale good enough to violate the Boost guidelines at this point?
Thanks,
Tobias