From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-30 21:25:05
"Jason Shirk" <jasonsh_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I fixed this problem after Beta 2. I can't think of a workaround. We
> are failing type deduction too early during partial ordering when
> encountering a dependent type.
>
> If you try the June CTP (community technology preview),
Was that sent out, or is it a download? I don't think I have it.
> I think you'll see the fix, but if not, rest assured, I verified our
> most recent internal build compiles this example cleanly
Cool, thanks.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com