From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-30 18:17:45
Rob Stewart wrote:
> From: Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]>
>
>>>Rob Stewart wrote:
>>>
>>>>> When classifying types it is often necessary to match against several
>>>>> variations of one aspect. There are special variations which make this
>>>>> possible. These are called *abstract variations*.
>>>>
>>But the term "variation" is used too often in this sentence.
>>
>> When classifying types it is often necessary to match against several
>> variations of one aspect. There are special, *abstract* variations for that.
>
>
> I'll grant that it is repetitious, but I don't care for your
> change. Here's another try:
>
> When classifying types it is often necessary to match against
> several variations of one aspect. Special, *abstract*
> variations make this possible.
>
Nice! Thanks!