From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-28 10:26:07
> [Dick] Nope, not sure at all. I overlooked "limited to linux on arm".
> (At any given time our "build" currently uses six instances of gcc -
> various PowerPC, x86 look-a-likes, DSPs, etc. - and I'll worry about
> those later.) Yes, your suggestion to put the test in libstdcpp3.hpp
> seems like it would work nicely. As a no-longer-lurking newbie, can I
> do something or do I sit back and wait for someone to add that test?
Well I can add the test, if you can tell me what defines identify Linux on
arm.
> [Dick] Once again I yelled before I was bit. I'm haven't been able to
> get bjam --v2 to pass BOOST_HAS_THREADS to the compiler so I ass-u-me-D
> it was some magic cookie that was being #undefD in preparation for use
> as a flag. Dumb. I'll go back to the boost.build list with this now.
> Thanks for the mentoring.
Using:
bjam -sBUILD="<define>BOOST_HAS_THREADS=1"
should do it.
John.