From: Chris Uzdavinis (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-27 15:33:03
Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:
> It seems all are pretty close in terms of portability (for the
> former two I know it and for Kylix it's another guess reading
> Boost.Config), so testing for below 0x600 is what you want, I guess
> (and above 0x551, reading the follow-up).
If the highest released Borland compiler is 0x570, why do you suggest
testing for "below 0x600"? Rounding up may inadvertantly include
future compilers that don't need such workarounds.
-- Chris