From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-05 22:51:09
Dave Harris wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <20050601173608.GA77601_at_[hidden]>
> cow_at_[hidden] (Jonathan Wakely) wrote (abridged):
>> Actually, it's moot because it's been semi-standardised in TR1, not
>> because you now understand the design goals ;)
>
> Really? My impression was that TR1 had not been reviewed in detail.
> When the hashing library was submitted to boost, I understood it to be the
> same as TR1 yet we found several problems with it. We did not blindly
> accept it just because it was in TR1.
Work on TR1 is finished. The hash library is not part of TR1.
Jonathan