From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-03 14:13:39
christopher diggins <cdiggins_at_[hidden]> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]>
>>
>> Here's my version:
> [snip]
>
> That code looks great! Any reason it can't go into boost as is? I would like
> to see that and a version which takes the step as a template parameter, to
> improve efficiency when the step size is known at compile-time.
A. there are no tests
B. What about the undefined behavior that results when you stride off
the end of a container?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com