From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-26 15:24:32
> | I couldn't incorporate all possible predicates
> | into library. Instead I provide generic tool. If you need this
> frequently in
> | some test module you could define one yourself.
>
> then why did you provide CHECK_EQUAL ? Afterall, it can be done with
> the generic tool.
equality comparison is most frequently used assertions.
> surely it wouldn't be too hard to write first hand tools for ==, !=, <, <=
> to give users the most pleasent experience ? (> and >= is not needed as we
> can
> reverse the arguments)
We need to set a line somewhere. But I don't mind adding several more
predefined tools, if there are enough people interested in this. Anyone to
support Thorsten?
Gennadiy