From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-23 23:11:17
Rene Rivera wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Of course :-) What I did was this:
>>>
>>> template<class Derived, class Base>
>>> BOOST_DLLEXPORT const void * void_cast_register(
>>> const Derived * /* dnull = NULL */,
>>> const Base * /* bnull = NULL */
>>> ){
>>> boost::python::detail::force_instantiate(
>>> void_cast_detail::void_caster_primitive<
>>> const Derived,
>>> const Base
>>> >::instance);
>>> return & void_cast_detail::void_caster_primitive<
>>> const Derived,
>>> const Base
>>> >::instance;
>>> }
>>
>>
>> Ouch! Looks like a nasty bug. If you can generate a small test case
>> I can pass it directly to their compiler engineer.
>
> I'll try.
This has been very interesting. Now I'm wondering why test_void_cast
passes. It seems to be a simple test case to me and should fail according
to the above. But it passes on all the CW compilers.
Robert Ramey