From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-19 08:17:36
Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Do we have counterparts to std::advance and std::distance that are
> optimized for random_access_traversal_tag instead of
> std::random_access_iterator_tag?
Not that I know of. It makes sense for you to add them somewhere
under boost/iterator. I suggest you take note of
boost/detail/iterator.hpp when doing so.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com