From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-11 14:30:44
David Abrahams wrote:
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>>Anyway, I'm inclined that we not try to do this by-value return
>>thing. Your thoughts?
>
>
> Still would like to hear them.
I agree. I think the current system is good enough.
>>Also:
>>
>> 1. for the lazy case we should probably use result_of<F()>::type on the
>> compilers that support it?
Yeah.
>> 2. We probably also need lazy_binding<p, k, f>::type, right?
>
>
> Now done.
Great!
-- Daniel Wallin