From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-11 10:19:32
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >>Hmm, I guess as long as they're both clearly labelled as
> public domain
> >>then that's OK, one file has "The code is considered to be in the
> >>public domain", if you can add that to other file as well,
> then I'll
> >>update the licence scanner to recognise that. Actually
> "This code is
> >>considered to be in the public domain" would be somewhat better
> >>English, but that's being pedantic
> >>;-)
> >
> >
> > Since I'm not a native English speaker I'd like to ask you
> for assistance
> > here ;-)
> > Please feel free to change the wording directly in the
> flex_string.hpp file.
>
> Thanks very much for emailing me about flex_string. If you could also
> insert the following copyright notice, I'd be most grateful (beware of
> wrapped lines):
[snip]
Done.
> By the way, if anyone is interested in adding flex_string to boost
> :o), I have recently updated the code and reached a design and
> implementation I'm very happy with.
Since Wave is accepted into Boost, it is already :-P
Could you please send this newest version to me, I'll try to update at least
the flex_string contained in the Wave distro.
Regards Hartmut