From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-04 22:34:54
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>
>> well, you can't call it io::char :-)
>
> Yeah, I know. Since char_<> would be an abomination,
Why?
> the alternative is char_type.
character_type?
> I've got the same problem with int_type.
Not sure how that fits in... :(
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com