From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-27 13:27:54


"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> It appears that aligned storage itself is not a POD, so the ::type
>> is necessary.

I can't imagine what would necessitate making aligned_storage<T> not a
POD. Can somebody please explain?

Thanks,

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com