From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-30 21:53:10
At 05:28 PM 3/30/2005, Peter Dimov wrote:
>Martin wrote:
>> - non-throwing is_* functions. I find it very inconvenient and error
>> prune to put try/catch around each is_directory call. Calling
>> is_accessible before every other is_* function is an option but not
>> much easier and still leaves a risk for an exception if another
>> process is accessing the file.
>
>Did is_accessible get added, after all?
Yes.
> That's bad. Let's remove it before
>it gets standardized and it's too late. :-)
?
--Beman