From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-20 08:39:34
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> Is there any reason address_of is not defined for shared_ptr,
> scoped_ptr etc.?
I've no idea what you mean, sorry. addressof(x) is an alias for &x that
works in the presence of overloaded operator& and is defined for every
object type. It should probably also support function types, but the current
implementation does not.