From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-10 04:35:00
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Do not give much weight to the opinion of the committee, either. The
> resolution of the hash<string> issue follows the path of the least
> resistance.
A typical comittee then?
> Nobody uses nonstandard character traits. They are fundamentally broken
> for a variety of reasons. Their only purpose is to generate discussions
> such as this one. ;-)
>
> But if this will make you feel better, define the overload as taking
> basic_string<Ch, char_traits<Ch>, A>. Nobody will spot the difference.
Oh, people on this list will. ;)
You're probably right, and I'm sure it wouldn't be long before someone
asked for support for that.