From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 16:57:37
Rob Stewart wrote:
>> struct MyState : fsm::simple_state<
>> MyState, Machine, mpl::list< /* ... */ > > {};
>>
>> struct MyState : fsm::simple_state< MyState, Machine >
>> {
>> typedef mpl::list< /* ... */ > reactions;
>> };
>
> I think the latter is far easier to grok since the
> fsm::simple_state parameter list is shorter and simpler. The
> same information must be supplied either way, but the second form
> separates distinct aspects of defining the state, so one can
> ignore some details when concentrating on others.
You do have a point there. Plus, if I'm not mistaken then this would
also remove a small glitch I have recently discussed with Darryl Green.
> Whether the latter form creates problems elsewhere, I don't know.
I haven't checked yet but I think it shouldn't.
Regards,
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.