From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-28 19:14:44
Rob Stewart wrote:
>> I think I am saying so: http://tinyurl.com/3kkog (Audience)
>
> I don't think that quite does it. The difference is that there
> you say that you assume familiarity with the subject matter and
> terminology, but nothing about experience. It is the latter that
> would permit the reader to recognize the StopWatch example as a
> toy and to map the code in the example to FSMs previously
> implemented other ways.
Fair enough. It is explained a little better in the rationale but I
guess that would be too technical for a tutorial. I'll see what I can
do...
>>> To avoid misconceptions, a disclaimer stating that the StopWatch
>>> example is too simple to benefit much from Boost.FSM, but serves
>>> to show how to use the library, would probably be a good idea.
>>
>> It seems that you haven't read the whole post. I've already agreed
>> with Jeff that I will write something in this direction.
>
> Actually, I did read it, but I was trying to suggest the flavor
> of what you might add to the document.
Ok, noted.
Regards,
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.