From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-27 13:55:40
Andy Little wrote:
>
Thanks for the fixes !
The online version has been corrected.
in function_type_result.hpp:
>
> namespace boost {
> //------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> namespace function_types
> {
> namespace detail
> {
> template<typename S,typename K> struct result_impl
> : mpl::at_c< S, 0 >
> { };
>
>
> /////////////////////////////////////////////////
> // struct result_impl <S,no_function,I>
Yeah, this is wrong !
> ///////////////////////////////////////
> template<typename S>
> /////////
> struct result_impl <no_function,S>
Well, it should be <S,no_function> to work (this specialization is to
keep the type member from being defined if used incorrectly with a
non-function type, the other way around <no_function,S> doesn't keep
things from working but doesn't do anything useful, either).
> { };
> }
>
> in function_type_parameter.hpp:
>
> line 44 :
> ////////////////////
> // , typename detail::mask_fun_kind_attr
> //////////////
> , typename detail::mask_func_kind_attr
> //////////
Agreed, here.
>
> regards
> Andy Little
>
>
It shows me that I have to write more tests/examples, very soon...
Regards,
Tobias