From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-10 11:56:34
"Vinzenz Feenstra" <evilissimo_at_[hidden]> wrote
> Hmm would be that "in-memory db" serializable ??
It's not at the moment, but it should be trivial to implement once there is
a need. Of course, individual fields need to be serializable, and this is
the user's responsibility.
We had a naive serialization in place at some point, and then we removed it.
If we do it again, it will most likely be done via the Boost Serialization
library.
Regards
Arkadiy