From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-01 05:16:28
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>
> You don't need 'typeof' for that kind of syntax sugar; a standard
> compliant compiler will suffice, see
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/77267.
>
Oh, that's very nice. I guess it could work on more compilers now as
well. I think using 'typeof' has a few small advantages (lets you use
operators, possibly faster compile times and maybe nicer error messages)
but that looks much better.
Daniel