From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-29 09:28:45
Reading the mpl documentation it states that boost::mpl::plus is expected to
be specialised for non Integral Constants.
Therefore should the following work ?:
typedef boost::mpl::plus<int,int>::type int_plus_int_type; // eg int
presumably
OTOH it could be said that:
mpl::plus<int_<1>, int_<1> >::type
and
mpl::plus<int,int>::type
are conceptually different and that therefore mpl::plus<int,int> should
be(remain) invalid.
Any thoughts?
regards
Andy Little