From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-24 12:43:31
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Am I right in thinking that boost::mem_fn:
>
> 1) Does not inherit from std::unary_function or std::binary_function when it
> should (as per the TR)?
Does the tr really specify that inheritance rather than simply that it
supply the nested typedefs??! I smell a defect!
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com