From: Douglas Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-08 10:32:47
On Jan 8, 2005, at 6:00 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>> Okay, so let's have BOOST_NO_RTTI defined when the
>> compiler/environment
>> does not support RTTI, and we can use it to turn off use of RTTI in
>> some Boost components :)
>>
>> But Peter is right, there are macros here... perhaps BOOST_NO_RTTI
>> and BOOST_NO_DYNAMIC_RTTI, with the former implying the latter.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me, but do we ever use RTTI in non-dynamic
> situations anyway?
Well, Function does. You can get the static type of the target function
object.
Doug